Hamer V. Sidway

Subject: Consumer Behavior

Paper Model: APA

Paper Type: Argumentative Essay

Total Words: 351

Document Outline

What difference would it had made in this case had the nephew not had the legal to drink or smoke? Why is this question crucial to the decision?

 


Document Preview

What difference would it had made in this case had the nephew not had the legal to drink or smoke? Why is this question crucial to the decision?

In this case, it was legal right of nephew to smoke and drink. This legal right was not taken by nephew in return of his promise to pay $5000 in case of not drinking and smoking. In a valid contract, consideration should be present for both parties. Waiver of this legal right is valid consideration for other party, in this case uncle. He is obliged to pay promised money to nephew. In case of waiver of not legal right is not considered consideration for other party. These both conditions are different and make contract valid or invalid.

Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Tags


Related Uploads

2 pages
.
.
2 pages
.

Hamer V. Sidway

Subject: Consumer Behavior

Model: APA

Type: Argumentative Essay

Words: 351

.

Recent Documents